robinhood-options-mobile

Databento vs Twelve Data: Can Databento Replace Twelve Data?

Analysis of whether Databento can serve as an alternative (or replacement) for Twelve Data, based on the functional groups defined in docs/twelve-data-migration.md.


Executive Summary

Databento is a strong alternative for market data (historical OHLCV, real-time quotes, options chains) but cannot replace Twelve Data for fundamental data (company profiles, insider transactions, institutional ownership, ESG scores, symbol search). The two providers serve different niches: Databento excels at low-latency, exchange-level tick/bar data; Twelve Data excels at higher-level financial data APIs with fundamentals.

Verdict: Databento is a complement to Twelve Data, not a full replacement. However, Databento can replace Twelve Data for specific high-value use cases (options chains, futures data, real-time streaming) while Twelve Data remains necessary for fundamentals.


Functional Group Comparison

1. Historical OHLCV Data

Aspect Twelve Data Databento
Endpoint GET /time_series GET /v0/timeseries.get_range (schema: ohlcv-1d, ohlcv-1h, ohlcv-1m)
Coverage Global stocks, ETFs, forex, crypto, commodities US equities only (20,000+ stocks/ETFs across 15 exchanges)
History depth 30+ years Up to 7 years (since 2018 for equities)
Intervals 1min to 1month 1sec, 1min, 1hour, 1day
Credit cost 1 credit/symbol Usage-based ($/GB) or included in subscription
Commercial use Pro plan ($229/mo) Standard plan ($199/mo for equities)

Can Databento replace Twelve Data? Partially.

Verdict: ⚠️ Partial replacement for US equities only. Twelve Data still needed for global coverage and deep history.


2. Real-Time Quotes

Aspect Twelve Data Databento
REST endpoint GET /quote or GET /price GET /v0/timeseries.get_range with recent range
WebSocket wss://ws.twelvedata.com/v1/quotes/price Native WebSocket streaming API
Latency Not specified 590 μs median latency
Coverage Global stocks, forex, crypto US equities, options, futures
Credit cost 1 credit/symbol (REST), 1 WS credit/symbol Included in subscription

Can Databento replace Twelve Data? Partially.

Verdict: ⚠️ Superior for US market data, but cannot cover forex/crypto/global.


3. Options Chains ⭐ KEY ADVANTAGE

Aspect Twelve Data Databento
Options chain ❌ NOT AVAILABLE ✅ Full OPRA feed
Greeks ✅ (via instrument definitions)
Real-time quotes
Historical ✅ (since 2019)
Unusual activity ⚠️ Can be derived from volume/OI data
Cost N/A $199/mo (OPRA Standard)

Can Databento replace Twelve Data? N/A — Twelve Data doesn’t have options.

Verdict: ✅ Databento fills the biggest gap in Twelve Data’s coverage. This is the primary reason to add Databento.


Aspect Twelve Data Databento
Endpoint GET /symbol_search?symbol={query} GET /v0/metadata.list_publishers + symbology API
Fuzzy search ❌ No fuzzy text search
Returns symbol, name, exchange, country, type instrument_id, raw_symbol, dataset
Coverage Global US only

Can Databento replace Twelve Data? No.

Verdict: ❌ Twelve Data (or another provider) needed for symbol search.


5. Company Profile / Fundamentals

Aspect Twelve Data Databento
Company profile GET /profile — name, sector, industry, CEO, description ❌ NOT AVAILABLE
Statistics GET /statistics — market cap, PE, EPS, beta, 52-week ❌ NOT AVAILABLE
Credit cost 10 credits/symbol N/A

Can Databento replace Twelve Data? No.

Verdict: ❌ Twelve Data (or another fundamentals provider) required.


6. Stock Screeners

Aspect Twelve Data Databento
Screener ❌ NOT AVAILABLE ❌ NOT AVAILABLE
Alternative Build custom with /stocks + /quote Build custom with real-time screener (see their blog tutorial)

Can Databento replace Twelve Data? Neither has a screener API.

Verdict: ➖ Neither provider has this. Both require custom work.


7. Insider Transactions

Aspect Twelve Data Databento
Endpoint GET /insider_transactions ❌ NOT AVAILABLE
Credit cost 200 credits/symbol N/A

Can Databento replace Twelve Data? No.

Verdict: ❌ Twelve Data required.


8. Institutional Ownership

Aspect Twelve Data Databento
Endpoint GET /institutional_holders ❌ NOT AVAILABLE
Credit cost 1,500 credits/symbol (Ultra plan) N/A

Can Databento replace Twelve Data? No.

Verdict: ❌ Twelve Data required (or keep Yahoo Finance for this).


9. ESG Scores

Aspect Twelve Data Databento
Endpoint GET /mutual_funds/world/sustainability ❌ NOT AVAILABLE
Coverage Mutual funds only (not stocks) N/A

Can Databento replace Twelve Data? No. Neither provider has good stock ESG coverage.

Verdict: ❌ Neither provider covers this well.


10. Put/Call Ratios (CBOE)

Aspect Twelve Data Databento
Source N/A (uses CBOE directly) ❌ NOT AVAILABLE

Can Databento replace Twelve Data? N/A — this uses CBOE’s free public endpoint directly.

Verdict: ➖ No change needed. Keep CBOE.


11. Futures Data ⭐ KEY ADVANTAGE

Aspect Twelve Data Databento
Coverage ⚠️ Commodities only (gold, oil via /commodities) ✅ Full CME, CBOT, NYMEX, COMEX
Contracts Generic commodity symbols Actual futures contract IDs (ES, CL, NQ, etc.)
Real-time ✅ (Pro+) ✅ ($179/mo CME Standard)
Historical ✅ (since 2010 for CME)
Order book ✅ Full book depth

Can Databento replace Twelve Data? Yes, and it’s significantly better.

Verdict: ✅ Databento is far superior for futures data.


12. Corporate Actions / Reference Data

Aspect Twelve Data Databento
Corporate actions ✅ 215 exchanges, 310,000+ securities, 60+ event types
Security master ✅ Security identifiers and mappings

Can Databento replace Twelve Data? Yes, for corporate actions specifically.

Verdict: ✅ Databento has corporate actions that Twelve Data lacks.


Coverage Gap Summary

Functional Group Twelve Data Databento Winner Notes
Historical OHLCV (US) Databento Lower latency, tick-level, but shorter history
Historical OHLCV (Global) Twelve Data Databento is US-only
Real-Time Quotes (US) Databento 590 μs median latency
Real-Time Quotes (Global/Forex/Crypto) Twelve Data Databento is US-only
Options Chains Databento Twelve Data’s biggest gap
Futures (CME) ⚠️ Commodities Databento Actual contracts vs generic
Symbol Search Twelve Data Databento has no text search
Company Profile Twelve Data Fundamentals not in Databento
Statistics / Ratios Twelve Data  
Insider Transactions Twelve Data  
Institutional Ownership Twelve Data  
ESG Scores ⚠️ Mutual funds only Neither  
Stock Screeners Neither  
Corporate Actions Databento  
WebSocket Streaming Databento Native, lower latency

Pricing Comparison

Scenario Twelve Data Databento Savings
US equities (historical + real-time) $229/mo (Pro) $199/mo (Equities Standard) $30/mo
Options chains ❌ Not available $199/mo (OPRA Standard) N/A
Futures (CME) ⚠️ Commodities only $179/mo (CME Standard) N/A
All three combined $229/mo (no options/futures) $577/mo (Equities + OPRA + CME) N/A
Fundamentals + search + insider ✅ Included in Pro ❌ Not available N/A

Pros and Cons of Databento as Alternative

Pros

  1. Fills Twelve Data’s biggest gaps — options chains (OPRA) and real-time CME futures are exactly what Twelve Data cannot provide
  2. OPRA licensing handled — Databento manages the OPRA vendor agreement, eliminating the $1,500/mo redistributor fee and compliance burden
  3. CME licensing handled — same for futures, no separate CME data license needed
  4. App Store redistribution confirmed — Standard plans explicitly allow commercial redistribution
  5. Lower latency — 590 μs median vs unspecified for Twelve Data; direct exchange feeds vs aggregated
  6. No exchange license fees — US Equities Mini dataset allows real-time stock data redistribution without per-user exchange fees
  7. Tick-level granularity — full order book depth available (L1/L2/L3), not just OHLCV bars
  8. Pay-as-you-go historical — only pay for historical data you actually download, no monthly minimum
  9. Corporate actions — covers 215 exchanges, 60+ event types (Twelve Data doesn’t have this)
  10. Normalized data format — single API for equities, options, and futures with consistent schema

Cons

  1. No fundamentals data — no company profiles, financial ratios, PE, EPS, market cap, beta, sector/industry
  2. No insider transactions — SEC filing data not available
  3. No institutional ownership — holder data not available
  4. No symbol search — no user-facing fuzzy text search API
  5. No ESG data — not available
  6. US-only coverage — no global stocks, forex, or crypto
  7. Shorter history — ~7 years for equities (since 2018) vs 30+ years on Twelve Data
  8. More complex integration — DBN (Databento Binary Notation) format requires their SDK; not simple JSON REST like Twelve Data
  9. Higher combined cost — if you need equities + options + futures, it’s $577/mo vs $229/mo for Twelve Data Pro (but Twelve Data doesn’t cover options/futures properly)
  10. Newer provider — less community resources, tutorials, and third-party integrations compared to Twelve Data
  11. No simple REST quote endpoint — getting a single stock price requires understanding datasets, schemas, and symbology (vs Twelve Data’s simple GET /price?symbol=AAPL)

Rather than replacing Twelve Data with Databento, use them together for complementary coverage:

Data Need Provider Cost
US equities historicals, quotes, search Twelve Data Pro $229/mo
Company profiles, fundamentals, statistics Twelve Data Pro (included)
Insider transactions Twelve Data Pro (included)
Institutional ownership (summary) Twelve Data Pro (included)
Options chains (OPRA) Databento OPRA Standard $199/mo
CME Futures Databento CME Standard $179/mo
Put/Call ratios CBOE (free) $0
ESG scores Keep Yahoo (server-side) or remove $0
Stock screeners Keep Yahoo (server-side) or build custom $0

Total estimated cost: ~$607/mo

Alternative: Databento for Everything (Drop Twelve Data)

If you wanted to consolidate on Databento only:

Data Need Databento Gap?
US equities historicals ✅ Equities Standard ($199/mo) Shorter history (7yr vs 30yr)
Real-time quotes ✅ Equities Mini (included)
Options chains ✅ OPRA Standard ($199/mo)
CME Futures ✅ CME Standard ($179/mo)
Symbol search Need alternative (build custom or keep Yahoo)
Company profiles Need alternative
Insider transactions Need alternative
Institutional ownership Need alternative
ESG Need alternative

Total Databento cost: ~$577/mo (but you’d still need another provider for fundamentals, search, etc.)

This approach saves ~$30/mo over the combined strategy but creates gaps that would need to be filled by yet another provider (e.g., Financial Modeling Prep at $29/mo, or EODHD at $60/mo for fundamentals).


Impact on Twelve Data Migration Plan

If Databento is adopted alongside Twelve Data, the migration plan in docs/twelve-data-migration.md would change as follows:

Migration Phase Original Plan With Databento
Phase 1: Server-side historicals Twelve Data /time_series No change — keep Twelve Data
Phase 2: Server-side quotes Twelve Data /quote No change — keep Twelve Data
Phase 3: Client-side migration Create twelve_data_service.dart No change — keep Twelve Data
Phase 4: Cleanup Remove Yahoo where possible Remove Yahoo for options chains → use Databento OPRA
NEW: Options chains Keep Yahoo (fragile) or Tradier Databento OPRA Standard ($199/mo)
NEW: Futures data Robinhood API only Databento CME Standard ($179/mo) for standalone futures

The key change: instead of keeping Yahoo Finance for options chains (as noted in the “Endpoints That Must Stay on Yahoo” section), Databento replaces Yahoo entirely for options data with a compliant, App Store-ready solution.


Sources